Swati Avasti |
In 2006, I was sitting with eleven other students and one
mentor during our first meeting at the Loft’s Mentor Series Program. I sat
upright, legs crossed, trying to project professionalism and writerly ju-ju
while hoping that no one would learn that I basically wrote between diaper
changes and during my children’s naps. Our
first mentor, poet Jim Moore, told us that this was our year to find our voice
as authors. A woman whose entrance piece I had read and greatly admired raised
her hand. She said something like: “I understand the idea of the voice of a
piece, but what is the author’s voice? And how do I find it?” She argued very
persuasively that each piece has a unique voice but the idea of an “author’s
voice” was too nebulous and too changeable to “find.” Still trying to hide my ignorance,
I said nothing—a cowardly decision, a decision I regret, and a decision I paid
for over eight long years. It is only now that I understand that both Jim and the
burgeoning writer were right.
Some authors’ voices are easy to peg. Take John Green, for
instance. Every character he writes, every perspective he writes from (male or
female) is the same. Pick out a line. It could come from anyone in any of his
books, main character or side character. Everyone sounds the same. When I pick
up a John Green novel, I know exactly what I will get—romance (more often than
not doomed) between hyper-intelligent kids, with lots of banter. Don’t get me
wrong: I love his voice, (I’ve read, re-read, and re-read Looking for Alaska), but I love his voice less over time and across
books because Green’s voice and his character’s voices are indistinguishable.
In fact, formerly a fan-girl, I doubt I’ll pick up his next because I’ve
already read it.
Other authors’ voices are hard to detect, changing so
dramatically from one piece to another that I can hardly see a resemblance.
Take M.T. Anderson, for instance. He wrote this opening:
“We went to the moon
to have fun, but the moon turned out to completely suck.
We went on a Friday,
because there was shit-all to do at home.
It was the beginning of spring break.
Everything at home was boring.
Link Arwalker was like, “I’m so null,” and Marty was all, “I’m null,
too, unit.”
—Feed
And this opening:
“The rain poured from
the heavens as we fled across the mud-flats, that scene of desolation; it
soaked through our clothes and bit at the skin with its chill. It fell hard and
ceaseless from the heavens as the deluge that had both inundated Deucalion and
buoyed up Noah; and as with that deluge, we knew not whether it fell as an
admonition for our sins or as the promise of a brighter, newly washed morning
to come.”
—The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing,
vol. 2
The narrators sound so remarkably different. Look at the syntax,
word choice, world view, authoritative stance, choices of metaphor, etc, etc.
This author demonstrates such a range of voices he can embody that the only
brand he can create is: damn good writing. When I pick up an MT Anderson novel,
I never know what I’ll get—and I love that. All I know is that he will astonish
me with brave, unique craft choices.
So how would I find his “voice?” As my friend in the mentorship
said, I can find the character’s voice, but the author’s?
As it turns out, I find his voice in the deep questions he
chooses to ask. Where John Green’s work asks how smart teenagers fall in love,
MT Anderson asks how freedom and courage stand against unfair, overwhelming power
structures.
An author’s voice can be flexible and distinguishable from
the characters’ when it isn’t about the words on the page, when it resides in
the deeper themes that an author approaches, the long-standing, life-haunting
questions that we can’t step around.
So, I turn to you now: what are the questions that haunt
you? Look at the body of work you have produced already. Where are the
commonalities? What techniques do you rely on? Which ones do you over-rely on? You
might write across genres, but underneath it all what questions drive the
characters, the themes, the plot?
Thanks, Swati, for reminding us to take the difficult path--and to read more M.T. Anderson.
ReplyDeleteJackie -- I see this in your work too actually! I see the question of what inspires greatness in your work which is one of the reasons I so enjoy reading your PBs.
DeleteI read Octavian Nothing volume 1 and just loved the voice, once I got used to it (and I learned so many new words!) Just picked up Volume 2 yesterday, and I can't wait to read it (thirty more books to go on the book list first, though.)
ReplyDeleteHa! We do keep you busy.
DeleteLove this, Swati. Till recently, I've given a lot more thought to the voice of each piece rather than my own author's voice, and how it might reside in the themes that fascinate -- or plague -- me. Thanks for this.
ReplyDeleteThat's so funny because I thought of you when I finished this and wondered to myself -- am I saying anything different than what Laura Ruby said when she lectured on Writing Fear?
DeleteThank you, Swati, for explaining voice so concisely. It's one of those concepts like theme that we talk around a lot because it's so hard to define.
ReplyDeleteThanks,Mandy. It is a bit of a slippery concept, isn't it? There's something else here that I'm still trying to tease out -- something about patterns. I notice, for instance, that in the two books I've cited above, MT Anderson starts us in similar places -- a boy on a journey. Obviously, I can't quite articulate it yet-- something about our approach to structure maybe? I should ask Marsha Q.
DeleteOne of my current Hamline students commented how this post made her think about both kinds of voice in her novel. Thank you, brilliant friend, for getting us to think about both kinds. Your questions toward the end are great ones to consider and apply to NF, too. You know how excited that gets me. How about a talk on this at an upcoming residency?
ReplyDeleteClaire-- As Tobin's latest book demonstrates, those who write across genres tend to still be fascinated by the same questions.
Delete