Showing posts with label voice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voice. Show all posts

Monday, September 1, 2014

Faculty Voices with Swati Avasti: Path to Your Voice


Swati Avasti

In 2006, I was sitting with eleven other students and one mentor during our first meeting at the Loft’s Mentor Series Program. I sat upright, legs crossed, trying to project professionalism and writerly ju-ju while hoping that no one would learn that I basically wrote between diaper changes and during my children’s naps.  Our first mentor, poet Jim Moore, told us that this was our year to find our voice as authors. A woman whose entrance piece I had read and greatly admired raised her hand. She said something like: “I understand the idea of the voice of a piece, but what is the author’s voice? And how do I find it?” She argued very persuasively that each piece has a unique voice but the idea of an “author’s voice” was too nebulous and too changeable to “find.” Still trying to hide my ignorance, I said nothing—a cowardly decision, a decision I regret, and a decision I paid for over eight long years. It is only now that I understand that both Jim and the burgeoning writer were right.

Some authors’ voices are easy to peg. Take John Green, for instance. Every character he writes, every perspective he writes from (male or female) is the same. Pick out a line. It could come from anyone in any of his books, main character or side character. Everyone sounds the same. When I pick up a John Green novel, I know exactly what I will get—romance (more often than not doomed) between hyper-intelligent kids, with lots of banter. Don’t get me wrong: I love his voice, (I’ve read, re-read, and re-read Looking for Alaska), but I love his voice less over time and across books because Green’s voice and his character’s voices are indistinguishable. In fact, formerly a fan-girl, I doubt I’ll pick up his next because I’ve already read it.

Other authors’ voices are hard to detect, changing so dramatically from one piece to another that I can hardly see a resemblance. Take M.T. Anderson, for instance. He wrote this opening:

“We went to the moon to have fun, but the moon turned out to completely suck.

We went on a Friday, because there was shit-all to do at home.  It was the beginning of spring break.  Everything at home was boring.  Link Arwalker was like, “I’m so null,” and Marty was all, “I’m null, too, unit.”
                                                                                                                          Feed

And this opening:

“The rain poured from the heavens as we fled across the mud-flats, that scene of desolation; it soaked through our clothes and bit at the skin with its chill. It fell hard and ceaseless from the heavens as the deluge that had both inundated Deucalion and buoyed up Noah; and as with that deluge, we knew not whether it fell as an admonition for our sins or as the promise of a brighter, newly washed morning to come.”
                                                                        The Astonishing Life of Octavian Nothing, vol. 2

The narrators sound so remarkably different. Look at the syntax, word choice, world view, authoritative stance, choices of metaphor, etc, etc. This author demonstrates such a range of voices he can embody that the only brand he can create is: damn good writing. When I pick up an MT Anderson novel, I never know what I’ll get—and I love that. All I know is that he will astonish me with brave, unique craft choices.

So how would I find his “voice?” As my friend in the mentorship said, I can find the character’s voice, but the author’s?

As it turns out, I find his voice in the deep questions he chooses to ask. Where John Green’s work asks how smart teenagers fall in love, MT Anderson asks how freedom and courage stand against unfair, overwhelming power structures.

An author’s voice can be flexible and distinguishable from the characters’ when it isn’t about the words on the page, when it resides in the deeper themes that an author approaches, the long-standing, life-haunting questions that we can’t step around.

So, I turn to you now: what are the questions that haunt you? Look at the body of work you have produced already. Where are the commonalities? What techniques do you rely on? Which ones do you over-rely on? You might write across genres, but underneath it all what questions drive the characters, the themes, the plot?

So, I pass along Jim Moore’s advice, modified: have the courage this year, and the next, and the next, to delve into the questions that won’t vanish from your life. And in Martha Graham’s words, have the courage to “keep the channel open.” It is the path to your voice. 







Thursday, December 15, 2011

Poetry Challenge - Let's Hear You!

We moved to Connecticut this summer because my husband joined the faculty at a boarding school called Choate Rosemary Hall. Which means we now live in a house connected to a dorm with 15 high school junior boys. Which means that every now and then students ask me for help with their essays during study hours. Which is fun.

For the last two nights I went to the school’s Poetry Out Loud contest, which is part of a national program to encourage young people to memorize and recite poetry. We’re amidst the final days before winter break, and the events competed with basketball drills, orchestra rehearsal, play practice and the like. So although the recitations were open to the public, I was the only audience member who was neither participant nor judge. (That’s right, I’m the new literary geek on campus!) Happily, the finalists will recite at a full school assembly later this year.

It was wonderful to watch the students take the stage, breathe deeply, and deliver the spirit of a poem through their demeanor and tone. We heard works by Naomi Shihab Nye, Emily Dickenson, Al Young, Shakespeare, Maya Angelou, and others. Some students giggled sheepishly after their performance, others high-fived their friends, and I wonder if any truly knew what a brave and beautiful act they had done.

As writers, we know that poetry is meant to be read aloud, with its sounds and rhythms physically resonating. Committing to learn a poem’s words and meanings by heart and internalizing its cadence is an even more powerful way to cultivate our love of language and enrich our own voices.

On the way home, I wondered what poems I could recite from memory: The King’s Breakfast and some others by A.A. Milne, plus a solid playlist of poems about things like escalators and drinking fountains and toasters and leaves. It’s nice to have the right words at your fingertips when you’re waiting for the toast to pop. Still, I’ll make it a new goal to broaden my repertoire.

What poems can you recite by heart? Or come reasonably close?

Friday, August 26, 2011

Writer, What a Big Story You Have! Better Cut It, My Dear

We're all told to cut our stories. We know we should. It's a rule. Give your reader the tip of the iceberg, not the whole darn thing. Jackie devoted a post to finding the "ness" instead of pouring all that we know about a character onto the page. But will cutting ever hurt the story? What if you're an over-cutter [this is like being an overachiever only with a delete button]? Do such stories exist? Have you ever wanted more?

When does cutting hurt the voice? Are you a minimalist who must flesh out the story? I can think of several examples where the protagonist's voice wouldn't be her own if the author had wielded a scalpel like Hannibal--Ida B comes to mind.

Are you a staunch pro-cutter? What happens if you cut a major plot artery? What if the voice bleeds off the page?

What do y'all think?

*Irene's fast approaching the NC coast. She's a pro-cutter; the electricity's first on her list. Time to gather the candles and lanterns and cut this draft. Stay safe, East Coasters!*

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

From the front


Another update from the residency.

12 days of lectures, workshops, and conversations about writing for children and teens. This is intense AND wonderful. Swathi Avasthi was a guest speaker yesterday and she spoke on Voice and YA fiction. A wonderful snippet: "Voice is the circulatory system of the novel."

You should have heard the buzz in the room when she shared that.

Today Kelly Easton and Claire Rudolph Murphy led workshops. Kelly's was on dialogue as a tool of character-building, while Claire led an exploration of the role of the antagonist. I slipped in and out of both and will be using snippets from both in my lecture on "The Paralyzed Protagonist" come Saturday.

We finished up the lecture/workshop part of the day with Marsha Chall's lecture on anthropomorphism (try spelling that at 1:30 a.m.!) in picture books. Piaget, Freud, Frog and Toad, and Marsha's own Labradoodle, Scout, were all part of the mix. I bet more than a few of the novelists in the crowd were inspired to go home and start a picture book about, well, bunnies or some such.

I'm learning lots and having fun and I need to go to bed.

Marsha Q.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

A Dog Blog



Hello. I'm Marsha's new puppy, Scout. I'm the only puppy in the family, but she's not the only writer. The working title of my opus is Bite the Bunny. Edgy stuff. I'm writing in first-puppy for its immediacy, but feel so limited from this point of view. Why not try omniscient while I have the opportunity to create a world and shape its inhabitants?
Here's a synopsis:
Follow the saga of one girl's struggle to Bite the Bunny--only the pink, squeaking bunny--while sorely tempted to bite a kitchen table leg, chicken leg, and pant leg. Will she overcome the trappings of instinct and survival to satisfy her ultimate yearning for family acceptance? Will she bond with the bunny? Bite only the bunny and grow to new dimensions of self-acceptance through bunny bonding?
Character and plot are no problem for me. Voice and tone are more of a challenge because I hear so many nuances. And don't get me started on setting...I'll have to chew on it.

Friday, September 25, 2009

Me, Myself, and Her

I mentioned the other day that I've been struggling with finding a voice for my new book, which feels like trying to make a soup with no stock*. Everything I've written has been in a revolving third person, most with some kind of narrative voice on top of that. I thought I might try first this time--it seemed like the best choice for the book. And I've been struggling and staring at empty pages and considering other careers . This morning, I switched to third--with a narrator--and suddenly could mange to string words together for the first time in awhile. My first person is precious, narcissistic, rambling, dull. My fellows-in-blogginess all do it so well, and it isn't until I try it that I realize how hard it is.

Do you all feel like you can do one better than another?

*I'm assuming, as I can't actually cook.